Ape Librarian <bite@banana.org> wrote in
news:mnocf4lma7m0dmkjeb9sgqjkb4i5v70gks@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:22:14 -0400, user <user@domain.org> wrote:
>
>>well, there's always been talk of "secret" groups. i went trolling
>>through my alt.binaries.* list and found some interesting ones, but
>>nothing with any real substance.
>>
>>>>>> On 11-Oct-2008, Justanut wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hate to be a spoil sport, but isnt she kind of old for us now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not when she's 'posing' with an Alsatian dog.
>>>>>> See Custom Set 259, on the secret group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nick Tait.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, its awesome ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> RD
>>>
>>>>
>>>>and hints as to the group name?
>>>
>>>Oh. My. God. Tell me you're kidding. PLEASE. :-)
>
>
> That's pretty much the point of why we're yanking people's chains
> here.
>
> There's so many people out there convinced that there are "secret"
> groups, but they don't exist. So every time someone "accidentally"
> mentions a "secret group," some goober always swallows the bait. Then
> the rest of us just follow along. :)
>
> There was a different group recently when poster A said to poster B
> "I'll see you in the other group," meaning a different *regular* group
> where they both routinely posted. Nothing more. Some yutz decided
> there were talking about a "secret group," and became quite agitated
> when no one divulged the info. In fact, the more people laughed at
> him, the more over the top and vulger he got! Git.
>
> He'd never posted anything in that group, which made it even funnier.
>
>
Thats exactly what i said in a.b.s.f.g
RD
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
misterdean@hushmail.com - will get my attention.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
|