On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:28:52 +0400, High Priest <HP@snotmail.com>
wrote:
>In article <Xns9BF3F0ED621C2yencpowerposterorg@193.202.122.125>,
>Yenc-Power-Post <yenc@powerposter.org> wrote:
>
>>
>
>> Quite true - to be A QUEER isnt illegal, neither is being a PEDO -
>> however, to look at pix of young semi-nude/nude preteen girls IS
>> illegal
>
>
>Wrong.
>
>In many jurisdictions it is illegal to look at an image that is deemed
>child pornography. Most pictures that are of a "young semi-nude/nude
>preteen" are not child pornography in, again, most jurisdictions.
Frankly, legal or illegal has nothing to do with this debate.
The intent of the creators and posters of these pics are no different
than those who create and post pics of real child pornography.
If you're cracking your nuts looking at these "young semi-nude/nude
preteens", you're no different than those doing the same thing over
pictures of that are universally recognized as child pornography.
The hypocrisy of it all is that some people around here who do it to
just pics of "young semi-nude/nude preteens" decide to pass judgement
on what is "creepy" and what is not creepy. To that I say.....
Fucking LOL
|
|