On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:22:14 -0400, user <user@domain.org> wrote:
>well, there's always been talk of "secret" groups. i went trolling
>through my alt.binaries.* list and found some interesting ones, but
>nothing with any real substance.
>
>>>>> On 11-Oct-2008, Justanut wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I hate to be a spoil sport, but isnt she kind of old for us now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Not when she's 'posing' with an Alsatian dog.
>>>>> See Custom Set 259, on the secret group.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nick Tait.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, its awesome ;)
>>>>
>>>> RD
>>
>>>
>>>and hints as to the group name?
>>
>>Oh. My. God. Tell me you're kidding. PLEASE. :-)
That's pretty much the point of why we're yanking people's chains
here.
There's so many people out there convinced that there are "secret"
groups, but they don't exist. So every time someone "accidentally"
mentions a "secret group," some goober always swallows the bait. Then
the rest of us just follow along. :)
There was a different group recently when poster A said to poster B
"I'll see you in the other group," meaning a different *regular* group
where they both routinely posted. Nothing more. Some yutz decided
there were talking about a "secret group," and became quite agitated
when no one divulged the info. In fact, the more people laughed at
him, the more over the top and vulger he got! Git.
He'd never posted anything in that group, which made it even funnier.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
|