On 04 Jun 2011 09:48:48 GMT, name@domain.com (RTermen) wrote:
>
>This is a set that, unfortunately
>like many others, might be incomplete.
>I've used multiple sources to make each
>model's sets the most complete I could but
>there are still often missing numbers within
>each set.
No, this is complete AFAIK. There were often gaps in the numbering,
and sets often started at a high number. I don't recall if any of the
OPs ever found outtakes or other shots to fill those holes. Guess
that's just how they were released. (Probably some oops shots too
risque to release.)
|
|