| Re: BB #52 4 rat - sorry no #65 [ 01 of 60 ] "m120-s02-01.jpg" yEnc (1/1) |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| poster (poster@use.net) |
2009/10/12 07:26 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pullnews.sonic-news.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!indigo.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!mauve.octanews.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.11.MISMATCH!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: poster@use.net
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Subject: Re: BB #52 4 rat - sorry no #65 [ 01 of 60 ] "m120-s02-01.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
Message-ID: <gab6d5l99ibqohubq58ll96c8remk1rjhv@4ax.com>
References: <FPpzm.309565$SZ7.300325@en-nntp-07.am2.easynews.com> <Xns9CA17E6C931C7ratTR17@198.186.190.162> <Xns9CA17FF2E5D04ratTR17@198.186.190.162>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 28
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:26:12 +0200
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb:1127
On 11 Oct 2009 19:34:32 GMT, muckrat <muckrat@modelworship.com> wrote:
>muckrat <muckrat@modelworship.com> wrote in news:Xns9CA17E6C931C7ratTR17@
>198.186.190.162:
>
>> Poster, you are a priceless gem!
>> I thank you so much for coming through with even a part of my request!
>>
>> One small thing, though.
>> Why do the images look damaged on the bottom?
>>
>> It turns out that I have the exact same problem with the set 52 that I
>> have. I was hoping that someone had an undamaged version.
>>
>> Still, I'm ecstatic that SOMEBODY was willing to help me out!
>>
>> -rat-
>>
>
>Actually looking at the placement of the watermark, which appears to be
>intact, I'm beginning to believe that the original photos were actually
>published with the "shifted bottom" defect. How utterly unfortunate!
>
>-rat-
Also bottom-right logo appears "on" the shifted bottom not "in"...
Think this is how the pics were published an then I have got from
OP...
|
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb/1127h', 'Re: BB #52 4 rat - sorry no #65 [ 01 of 60 ] "m120-s02-01.jpg" yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}