On 11 Oct 2009 19:34:32 GMT, muckrat <muckrat@modelworship.com> wrote:
>muckrat <muckrat@modelworship.com> wrote in news:Xns9CA17E6C931C7ratTR17@
>198.186.190.162:
>
>> Poster, you are a priceless gem!
>> I thank you so much for coming through with even a part of my request!
>>
>> One small thing, though.
>> Why do the images look damaged on the bottom?
>>
>> It turns out that I have the exact same problem with the set 52 that I
>> have. I was hoping that someone had an undamaged version.
>>
>> Still, I'm ecstatic that SOMEBODY was willing to help me out!
>>
>> -rat-
>>
>
>Actually looking at the placement of the watermark, which appears to be
>intact, I'm beginning to believe that the original photos were actually
>published with the "shifted bottom" defect. How utterly unfortunate!
>
>-rat-
Also bottom-right logo appears "on" the shifted bottom not "in"...
Think this is how the pics were published an then I have got from
OP...
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb/1127', 'Re: BB #52 4 rat - sorry no #65 [ 01 of 60 ] "m120-s02-01.jpg" yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}