| Re: REQ - Budding Beauties 52,65,69 |
Your Company |
| MrD (MrD@email.org) |
2009/10/02 00:13 |
muckrat <muckrat@modelworship.com> wrote in
news:Xns9C97D8BA148C8ratTR17@198.186.190.162:
> Lummox <running@muck.com> wrote in
> news:e6Ywm.42889$_J4.27152@en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com:
>
>> muckrat <muckrat@modelworship.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns9C928D77BB70BratTR17@ 198.186.190.162:
>>
>>> I've decided not to subject the group the rest of my BB flood.
>>> Sets 52, 65, and 69 are the only BB fils that I really want.
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>>> -rat-
>>
>> I hope you will reconsider. I was looking forward to filling my
>> collection with sets 51 and above. As it is, my sincere thanks for
>> what you did post. There are some sweet little cupcakes in there!
>>
>> I only have sets 23, 24, and 25 from your original wanted list.
>> (It's only now that I'm finally getting around to reading the text
>> posts.)
>>
>>
>> Lummox
>>
>
> It's nice to know that SOMEONE appreciates my BB post.
> None of the other regs has even bothered to acknowledge that the post
> ever happened.
>
> As for resuming the BB flood, I hope to have more time after
> Saturday. Plus, I want to give the Tori flood plenty of time to
> complete.
>
> On the other hand, I'm beginning to sense that no BB fills are
> forthcoming, which was the whole reason for doing the flood in the
> first place. If that is indeed the case, there is little incentive
> for me to continue.
>
> -rat-
>
Hello MrRat - please do not feel bad that no-one replies. I have on
many occasions said that i do not reply to posts i am not interested
in, HOWEVER - i do appreciate those who post.
Just want to make my point - even if BB is not "my thing" ;)
MrD
|
|
|