Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pullnews.sonic-news.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!feeder.news-service.com!news.astraweb.com!border2.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Subject: Re: Ping jorj - About Digital watermarks, with examples - "Jenna_digimarked_level1.jpg" 721.9 KBytes yEnc
From: MrD <MrD@email.org>
References: <KfSdnWDo3u2PwF_XnZ2dnUVZ8lQAAAAA@giganews.com> <hLGdnRjwepqGB1_XnZ2dnUVZ_hxi4p2d@giganews.com>
Organization: Your Company
Message-ID: <Xns9C9613A27AAE0MrD.email.org@127.0.0.1>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: 29 Sep 2009 23:56:12 GMT
Lines: 104
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4ab6568d.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=B`0mWU=BfW>5WGRN4JSiW2L?0kYOcDh@:cKbERRL;Zc7Y1^IF2;QYI8^<Y:ADc1_H<@bh5b83bVc01egJ?cieo31
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb:1089
jorj <jorj@hea.ven> wrote in
news:hLGdnRjwepqGB1_XnZ2dnUVZ_hxi4p2d@giganews.com:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:17:19 +0000, NottyBrother wrote:
>
>> Here you have jenna.jpg, I nice girl I met online. This photo is the
>> reference an is not digitally watermarked
>>
>> The other photos are the same picture but watermarked, each one with
>> a different strength.
>>
>> Level 1 is less visible but less durable Level 4 is more visible but
>> more durable.
>>
>> I inserted a Transaction code "69696969"
>>
>> You can read This transaction code with in several ways:
>>
>> If you have Photoshop CS4, use the Digimarc plugging. you can also
>> use the executable I am posting, and run read watermarks from
>> context menu in explorer (if you don't trust me, what I fully
>> understand, you can download it free from Digimarc site.)
>>
>>
>> I removed in all images all metadata, like EXIF, XMP, Photoshop
>> meta, etc.. even the thumbnail so it will not be an issue when
>> comparing the files.
>>
>> As you will be able to see, digitally watermarking CHANGES the color
>> of pixels of the image.
>>
>> feel free to crop, resize, etc and check for yourself if you can
>> have get watermarks removed without destroying the picture...
>>
>> In my tests, long time ago, with a 1200dpi wax color printer and a
>> 1200 dpi scanner, the digital watermarked survived after I printed
>> the photo and scanned it.
>>
>> Any doubt, fell free to reply please... After all this is ALSO a
>> discussion group :-)
>>
>> With all respect,
>
> See?
>
> Webe did not use digimarc. I never said they did. Also (here it is
> again.. ready?) I NEVER SAID I REMOVED THE FUCKING WATERMARK.
> Remember when I said that before? Oh, that's the part you didn't
> bother to read... just like you probably won't read it again this
> time.
>
> Meh.
>
> I said there was a way to flood the server and cause it to dump
> UNWATERMARKED pictures. I know this and I know how watermarked pics
> from them look, because I wrote the fucking software to do what I
> already told you I did.
>
> You're an idiot for assuming I don't know what I am talking about.
>
> You're an idiot for assuming you do.
>
> You're an idiot for assuming everyone uses digimarc.
>
> You're an idiot because you assume when I say webe watermarked their
> shit I said they used digimarc - I said no such thing.
>
> You're an idiot because you obviously didn't read what I said, you
> just saw one thing you could disagree with then right back trying to
> prove AGAIN that I could not do something I never said I did.
>
> You're an idiot because you obviously are more interested in talking
> than listening. Then you try to cover it up telling me "respect."
> Bullshit, you didn't politely disagree you simply said I was wrong -
> when, in fact, it's you who is entirely in the wrong here. Of course
> you will never admit it - but then again, I will never care so we're
> even.
>
> Feel free to visit March on the better servers and grab the
> "kleenXBuMod" bunny sets 63,64,65. I'm the one who grabbed those off
> webe's servers and I'm the one who wrote the code that did it. Do
> compare these to any other sets of that range you find. If you'd care
> to disagree further about what constitutes a watermark, feel free to
> reply to someone who cares. I said way too much already, but I doubt
> Goldberg or Greene or whatever his name is is gonna be coming after
> me for infringment.
>
wow - and i thought i was the bad guy :)
Quote:
"Of course you will never admit it - but then again, I will never care
so we're even."
Yet you rant off as if you do actually ... care ;)
Don't worry bro, i wont tell - i am also an asshole most times, i rant
and rage at.... nothing i guess - i just like to.... rant and rage :)
MrD - i don't care either....... or do i?
PS:
Watch out for a new model website!! Nothing watermarked - i will just
kill you for reposting here ;)
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb/1089h', 'Re: Ping jorj - About Digital watermarks, with examples - "Jenna_digimarked_level1.jpg" 721.9 KBytes yEnc')){kind=link}