On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:17:19 +0000, NottyBrother wrote:
> Here you have jenna.jpg, I nice girl I met online. This photo is the
> reference an is not digitally watermarked
>
> The other photos are the same picture but watermarked, each one with a
> different strength.
>
> Level 1 is less visible but less durable Level 4 is more visible but
> more durable.
>
> I inserted a Transaction code "69696969"
>
> You can read This transaction code with in several ways:
>
> If you have Photoshop CS4, use the Digimarc plugging. you can also use
> the executable I am posting, and run read watermarks from context menu
> in explorer (if you don't trust me, what I fully understand, you can
> download it free from Digimarc site.)
>
>
> I removed in all images all metadata, like EXIF, XMP, Photoshop meta,
> etc.. even the thumbnail so it will not be an issue when comparing the
> files.
>
> As you will be able to see, digitally watermarking CHANGES the color of
> pixels of the image.
>
> feel free to crop, resize, etc and check for yourself if you can have
> get watermarks removed without destroying the picture...
>
> In my tests, long time ago, with a 1200dpi wax color printer and a 1200
> dpi scanner, the digital watermarked survived after I printed the photo
> and scanned it.
>
> Any doubt, fell free to reply please... After all this is ALSO a
> discussion group :-)
>
> With all respect,
See?
Webe did not use digimarc. I never said they did. Also (here it is
again.. ready?) I NEVER SAID I REMOVED THE FUCKING WATERMARK. Remember
when I said that before? Oh, that's the part you didn't bother to read...
just like you probably won't read it again this time.
Meh.
I said there was a way to flood the server and cause it to dump
UNWATERMARKED pictures. I know this and I know how watermarked pics from
them look, because I wrote the fucking software to do what I already told
you I did.
You're an idiot for assuming I don't know what I am talking about.
You're an idiot for assuming you do.
You're an idiot for assuming everyone uses digimarc.
You're an idiot because you assume when I say webe watermarked their shit
I said they used digimarc - I said no such thing.
You're an idiot because you obviously didn't read what I said, you just
saw one thing you could disagree with then right back trying to prove
AGAIN that I could not do something I never said I did.
You're an idiot because you obviously are more interested in talking than
listening. Then you try to cover it up telling me "respect." Bullshit,
you didn't politely disagree you simply said I was wrong - when, in fact,
it's you who is entirely in the wrong here. Of course you will never
admit it - but then again, I will never care so we're even.
Feel free to visit March on the better servers and grab the "kleenXBuMod"
bunny sets 63,64,65. I'm the one who grabbed those off webe's servers and
I'm the one who wrote the code that did it. Do compare these to any other
sets of that range you find. If you'd care to disagree further about what
constitutes a watermark, feel free to reply to someone who cares. I said
way too much already, but I doubt Goldberg or Greene or whatever his name
is is gonna be coming after me for infringment.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb/1088', 'Re: Ping jorj - About Digital watermarks, with examples - "Jenna_digimarked_level1.jpg" 721.9 KBytes yEnc')){kind=link}