Collector <Yenc@yenc-post.org> wrote in
news:54c30a96$0$57813$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com:
> Weener <Suck@mysaggytits.com> wrote in
> news:54c2c956$0$27601$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com:
>
>> Here are the first couple sets. Still going through your list.
>>
>> What I've figured out so far:
>>
>> As far as I can tell, y109_001 only has 93 pics. The index could have
>> an error there. Tatjana posted 93 pics back in 2009. Set 024 hasn't
>> surfaced yet.
>>
>> y091_020 doesn't have 010 or 012, it is complete with 93 pics without
>> them...I'm posting the complete set.
>>
>> y117_045 hasn't been posted yet.
>> y117 (cstm 2007-04-16) 17 pics posted by Collector 11-27-2013.
>> Header: For Carlg and others that need.
>>
>> More coming. Feel like a turtle drunk on molasses :)
>> Weener
>>
>>
>
> Hi Weener
> You are right y109-001 has only 93 pics of the 102 advertise on the
> site. The index was originally created from the info on the site.
> we all know sometimes the image count didn't always agree with what
> was shown on the site.
>
> When i made the 2014 vladindex, i left as is the original info in the
> text file.
>
> Now... was it a typo error from the site or a poster holding back a
> few images.
> Only an original buyer of the set could tell.
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/20070205055214/http://www.vladmodels.ru/inde
> x.ph p?page_id=sets&mid=y109
>
> Regards
> Collector
>
Sorry, here's the correct URL to y109
http://web.archive.org/web/20070225172152/http://www.nadya-vladm.com/?
page=viewsets&mid=y109
Collector
|
|