Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels
Subject: Re: Question: Another silly one from Lucky
From: Weener <Suck@mysaggytits.com>
References: <ZPidndgNNZuuKSXJnZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Organization: Your Company
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: 23 Jan 2015 20:41:28 GMT
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <54c2b1f8$0$34370$b1db1813$46decd27@news.astraweb.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: d9943c44.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=e07YUjL6CA>YUQJRTa54B1L?0kYOcDh@:9=KdnTTHDh0FRPSXaZN\E2l9B_G1R=S=7_9`PW>P2Hl0hmJQd_^0e@<TOWNILSgh:5TRRK<BOo:17
X-Received-Body-CRC: 132154403
X-Received-Bytes: 1886
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels:958
"Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in
news:ZPidndgNNZuuKSXJnZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com:
> I was looking at my y047 Lena folder. Trying to figure out how to get
> at least five more sets. Or, at least another 45 photos. According to
> the Vortex index their are only six sets. I own six sets as follows:
> 002, 003, 005, 008, 010, and 011. Does that mean the other sets don't
> exist? That they never were sold? Or, just that Vortex never saw the
> other sets? I would at least like to find set 001. I would think that
> given the time span between sets there is more like 20 sets based on
> my theory that she modeled for three to four years. This is just a
> question using one model as an example and could very easily apply to
> more models. Of course that would mean there are a lot of sets out
> there that will require a lot of patience to acquire ; - )
> Lucky
>
Hi Lucky, Those 6 sets are all that have ever been posted here so far.
Cheers,
Weener
|
|