Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: OddBALL <odd@ball.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels
Subject: Re: Typical British housewife
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:35:13 -0700
Message-ID: <r350fbphfonf4osn5kf5iurg1mruuqsq6c@4ax.com>
References: <56da53fa$0$38587$b1db1813$d2f06f9f@news.astraweb.com> <T8OdnZIhrLLoyUfLnZ2dnUU7-dPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <pffrdblhb1lcunop1q0too5ojb1d2rpqmb@4ax.com> <ovjsdbpsldn48am5gdou9v77tnjeesluuv@4ax.com> <9k1eeb1l1gekdnq379mf2gso9mpn2f43f8@4ax.com> <gu8oebdht6qg387ef60ljfrckuqv94blsn@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 40
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82972734.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=[W`Be8lVLk<J0Z]=gbPP29L?0kYOcDh@:18J:flTQG45=]\:62bQ2c5l23]GVn`Zm69Z?Ld2=1HA;1>2]OOF_GW2XIlN0;aZgH>08IK5mYFLX:
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3454102916
X-Received-Bytes: 2400
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels:3109
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:59:36 -0400, LAKing@NHAx.net wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:47:01 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 23:09:18 -0500, LAKing@NHAx.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:44:50 -0800, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 21:37:25 -0600, "Lucky"
>>>><LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>She looks Dutch to me
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>British women make the worst wives. They are even worse than American
>>>>women now, if you can believe that.
>>>
>>>
>>>So in addition to Mexican we can add British and American to the
>>>Misogyny Top 10 List?
>>
>>
>>Saying that certain nationalities make for bad wives has nothing to do
>>wtih misogyny. Or did you just want to use that word to feel
>>politically correct like a good mangina?
>>
>>What if I said that men from Iran make for bad husbands? Would you say
>>we can add Iran to the MisAndry Top 10 List?
>>
>>You have a double standard so deep you don't even know it.
>
>Never said misogyny was the same thing. I just happend to call you a
>misogynist when replying to your latest gem.
>
>You are a prejudiced, bigoted misogynist. How's that?
The very thing you wrote to me shows that you are a prejudiced,
bigoted misanthrope.
|
|