Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Duke <Duke@Earl.com>
Organization: Weenie's Nut sack and licking pole
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels
Message-ID: <201508171040549590-Duke@Earlcom>
References: <074b20ced888d71ccebd3bcd613234d6@anemone.mooo.com> <2015081419400185381-Yenc@yencpostorg> <cba069cd1c44d23bb9c1791f02265086@anemone.mooo.com> <2015081619512770213-Doff@Modode> <55d0d09e$0$43059$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> <b51996ebe150edfadc5cabdfa7a66849@anemone.mooo.com> <55d133f6$0$19846$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: Hi Ma - REQ pls
User-Agent: Unison/2.1.10
Lines: 44
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tweaknews.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:40:55 UTC
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:40:54 +0200
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2092351002
X-Received-Bytes: 3316
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels:1933
On 2015-08-17 01:08:06 +0000, Weener said:
> Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> wrote in
> news:b51996ebe150edfadc5cabdfa7a66849@anemone.mooo.com:
>
>> Weener I know you're replying to Ma but can I say I wish there'd be
>> no friction here and more posting, whatever the content (within
>> reason of course). I don't feel confident just yet posting, but
>> will when I do and I really, really want the group to be around
>> until then. No apologies from anyone, just getting on would be
>> great - or even ignoring each other if you and Ma can't, but keep
>> the group alive. Same sentiments to Ma too. I appreciate both of
>> you and so do all the others who visit, lurk or post in this group.
>>
>> I do wonder what happened to Collector though - his CSV is
>> magnificent. There is one thing though. I don't really understand
>> hashing tables but I do understand cryptographic hash functions
>> such as SHA and I know that Piccheck is only using CRC because of
>> the 8 place output (32bit) whereas SHA1 gives a 40 place output
>> (160bits) and is much more precise in identifying dupes than the
>> really, really old CRC. I ran a dupe check on the pics checked
>> with Piccheck using Collector's .csv and there are, at SHA1 hash, a
>> lot of dupes I thought. Perhaps Piccheck needs a stronger hash
>> function than CRC? Or the dupes are acceptable in collecting Vlad
>> because they were published as dupes with different names?
>>
>
> It most likely just means there are duplicates in his csv. I've not
> looked at his big one, if that's what your talking about. If your dupe
> checker found duplicate pictures, there should be duplicate crc's in the
> csv, that go with them. Some models have duplicate sets released that
> way, and the csv could have mistakes, so it's not unusual. I don't
> really know anything about SHA1.
>
> As far as getting along with Red Dog, he doesn't want to get along.
> Can't you tell. You either do as he says, or get attacked. Agree with
> him or get attacked.
>
> Weener
Hey weenie boy,
The RedDawg is in the house. Say hello. He won't bite... Too hard
that is. lol
|
|