Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 12:01:45 -0500
From: "Lucky" <LuckyLou@lizardlick.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels
Subject: Re: Katya m020/y017 question and request
References: <upk2q9du7r4jjvllljsg9sl50o9r3190gj@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Mimo Usenet Browser - http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Organization:
Message-ID: <Z6idnSjmrrLnJzjOnZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 12:01:46 -0500
Lines: 27
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-I20jWxVX4aohjsmX2zjonay+le8oaiDaaqdbaL9Hc15DUyH3gkGdOlBFDykqz4X25LpCTXzXLrnTmDU!+nLE/cBblBEdZkHvsN+N9k/Wv6ThIhyl76iJitd2EmPgYuP9owXmXELcL2VcGOT+Yt6jqHc+2gqW
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1918
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3217982395
X-Received-Bytes: 2171
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels:176
Thank you good info
On 18 Jun 2014 01:58 AM ,katyalover <back@home.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:05:35 -0500, "Lucky" <LuckyLou@lizardlick.com>
> wrote:
>
> >The question is would any of Katya's sets be considered m020, and if so, where is the cutoff?
> >The request is for set 002
>
> Is set 2 available? I only have the previews, which I can post.
> I lack sets:
> 2 5 6 7 8
> 10 11 14 16 18 19
> 20 22 23 26 27 28 29
> 30
>
> I think she was m020 until the numbered sets were issued in 2002, when
> she was reclassified as y017. A good rule of thumb is to regard all
> her numbered sets as y017 and all others m020.I see that I haven't
> done that though.
> I'll post some stuff when I have resorted my collection!
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
|
|