alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodelsPrev. Next
Re: Are these sets we need? Sorry about quality best I could do Your Company
CarlG (carlg@fasfpost.net) 2015/07/30 14:28

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels
Subject: Re: Are these sets we need? Sorry about quality best I could do
From: CarlG <carlg@fasfpost.net>
References: <RaGdndJi9acyfyXInZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> <p4-dnawciMfdACTInZ2dnUU7-dednZ2d@giganews.com>
Organization: Your Company
Message-ID: <XnsA4E7DA230FDB2carlgfasfpostnet@81.171.92.222>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Lines: 16
NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.237.7.219
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
X-Trace: 1438288090 92.237.7.219 (Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:28:10 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:28:10 UTC
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:28:10 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 27127714
X-Received-Bytes: 1538
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels:1732

"Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in news:p4-
dnawciMfdACTInZ2dnUU7-dednZ2d@giganews.com:

> Or maybe I should ask, REQ: does anyone have any of these?
>

Hello Lucky..like Weener I haven't seen those before, but I'm curious about
the quality.  The resolution as posted is 120 px/in which is almost twice
the resolution of a standard Vlad image, yet they are severely pxilated.
The first is a bit-map image and is probably uncompressed
 (which makes the lack of quality surprising but strangely it is of similar
size to the second ) and the second is a jpg and could be highly compressed
(which could explain the low quality) How did you prepare them? Were they
scanned at a low resolution and then resized or are they as you found them.
Anyway thank you for posting them
Carlg

Follow-ups:12345
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite