"Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in
news:Xf6dnX9z6KdMKSrInZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
> On 28 Jul 2015 09:17 AM ,Weener <rs@wagner.com> wrote:
>> "Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in
>> news:oIWdnRPPEZDSNyvInZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>
>> >
>> > On 27 Jul 2015 02:13 PM ,Weener <rs@wagner.com> wrote:
>> >> "Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in
>> >> news:vvidncehVLO4CivInZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com:
>> >>
>> >> > Any chance you found something you could use?
>> >> > Lucky
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Yes I did :)
>> >>
>> >> 43,48,57,58,60 all marked n. I don't expect you to post those
>> >> thouugh
>> >> :)
>> >>
>> >> Can you look at your 064 cstm. I think you might have some regular
>> >> no logo pics mixed in there. They will be smaller size, with no
>> >> exif. If so I can post the clean set.
>> >>
>> >> This PicCheck comparison is wiggin me out a little, It shows files
>> >> that you need, but when I look them up in your csv, you have them.
>> >> I quess I don't know exactly how it works yet or it has a bug.
>> >>
>> >> We have a bunch of sets that are different sizes. Maybe you got
>> >> those somewhere else and they are not originals. Maybe I get you
>> >> to post one so we can compare them some time. I'm sure mine are
>> >> originals because I made my csv's from Tat's master csv a looong
>> >> time ago :)
>> >>
>> >> Something's weird with our set 030's too but I have to rest my
>> >> brain, LOL
>> >>
>> >> Before I forget, you have some customs named as regular sets:
>> >>
>> >> Your:
>> >> m042_005 is m042_005 (cstm 2002-06-28) - 112 pics
>> >> m042_015 is m042_015 (cstm 2002-09-20) - 81 pics
>> >> m042_021 is m042_021 (cstm 2003-02-07) - 124 pics this set is
>> >> duplicated in your cstm csv.
>> >> m042_033 is m042_033 (cstm 2003-07-11) - 103 pics
>> >> m042_035 is m042_035 (cstm 2003-03-14) - 122 pics this set is
>> >> duplicated in your cstm csv.
>> >>
>> >> Regular sets for the above
>> >>
>> >> Some No Logo sets:
>> >>
>> >> Your:
>> >> m042_164 is No Logo
>> >> 171-172 are no logo and a bunch of the sets that follow.
>> >>
>> >> In set m042_121 (cstm 2004-12-11) - 70 pics, you have 3 pics with
>> >> logos 007,015,020. They are duplicates of 008,018,024 in the
>> >> regular set. YOu can delete those.
>> >>
>> >> And that 074 (768x1024) and 74 (Web) nologo are the same.
>> >>
>> >> Weener
>> >
>> >
>> > Weener
>> > Sorry about that, I'm a little embarrassed about that mess. It's a
>> > folder I've procrastinated much too long.
>> >
>> > You were right about the 064cstm. Thanks I fixed it no need to
>> > post. Also fixed set 030, had some cstm mixxed in. I once said I
>> > was like a dumpster diver. I gathered my sets any way I could.
>> > Most came from torrents. When a torrent didn't come through all of
>> > the way I would keep what was good and add on to it. So yeah, I
>> > guess I'd better learn how to use pic check. Thank's for looking
>> > at those. Do you know the trick of combining rar's with a video? If
>> > so I would gladly post some vids with n files inside. Lucky
>> >
>>
>> I don't think I've ever heard of combining rar's with a video, unless
>> I'm overlooking something.
>>
>> Weener
> It's never recommended to use it with someone you are not familiar
> with. It's how they embed virus's into videos. Using the cmd ln. you
> can drop rar files into a video. Then send it. the other person
> recieving just renames the video to rar and unload it's contents. I've
> tested the technique before but it's been a while. I think I
> encountered it from the artbbs site way back when. I wouldn't download
> anything that requires it from there any more.
> Lucky
>
>
LOL, I've seen it done putting txt file in jpg. It just dawned on me. :)
|
|