On 28 Jul 2015 09:17 AM ,Weener <rs@wagner.com> wrote:
> "Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in
> news:oIWdnRPPEZDSNyvInZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
> >
> > On 27 Jul 2015 02:13 PM ,Weener <rs@wagner.com> wrote:
> >> "Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in
> >> news:vvidncehVLO4CivInZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com:
> >>
> >> > Any chance you found something you could use?
> >> > Lucky
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yes I did :)
> >>
> >> 43,48,57,58,60 all marked n. I don't expect you to post those thouugh
> >> :)
> >>
> >> Can you look at your 064 cstm. I think you might have some regular no
> >> logo pics mixed in there. They will be smaller size, with no exif. If
> >> so I can post the clean set.
> >>
> >> This PicCheck comparison is wiggin me out a little, It shows files
> >> that you need, but when I look them up in your csv, you have them. I
> >> quess I don't know exactly how it works yet or it has a bug.
> >>
> >> We have a bunch of sets that are different sizes. Maybe you got those
> >> somewhere else and they are not originals. Maybe I get you to post
> >> one so we can compare them some time. I'm sure mine are originals
> >> because I made my csv's from Tat's master csv a looong time ago :)
> >>
> >> Something's weird with our set 030's too but I have to rest my brain,
> >> LOL
> >>
> >> Before I forget, you have some customs named as regular sets:
> >>
> >> Your:
> >> m042_005 is m042_005 (cstm 2002-06-28) - 112 pics
> >> m042_015 is m042_015 (cstm 2002-09-20) - 81 pics
> >> m042_021 is m042_021 (cstm 2003-02-07) - 124 pics this set is
> >> duplicated in your cstm csv.
> >> m042_033 is m042_033 (cstm 2003-07-11) - 103 pics
> >> m042_035 is m042_035 (cstm 2003-03-14) - 122 pics this set is
> >> duplicated in your cstm csv.
> >>
> >> Regular sets for the above
> >>
> >> Some No Logo sets:
> >>
> >> Your:
> >> m042_164 is No Logo
> >> 171-172 are no logo and a bunch of the sets that follow.
> >>
> >> In set m042_121 (cstm 2004-12-11) - 70 pics, you have 3 pics with
> >> logos 007,015,020. They are duplicates of 008,018,024 in the regular
> >> set. YOu can delete those.
> >>
> >> And that 074 (768x1024) and 74 (Web) nologo are the same.
> >>
> >> Weener
> >
> >
> > Weener
> > Sorry about that, I'm a little embarrassed about that mess. It's a
> > folder I've procrastinated much too long.
> >
> > You were right about the 064cstm. Thanks I fixed it no need to post.
> > Also fixed set 030, had some cstm mixxed in. I once said I was like a
> > dumpster diver. I gathered my sets any way I could. Most came from
> > torrents. When a torrent didn't come through all of the way I would
> > keep what was good and add on to it. So yeah, I guess I'd better learn
> > how to use pic check. Thank's for looking at those. Do you know the
> > trick of combining rar's with a video? If so I would gladly post some
> > vids with n files inside. Lucky
> >
>
> I don't think I've ever heard of combining rar's with a video, unless
> I'm overlooking something.
>
> Weener
It's never recommended to use it with someone you are not familiar with. It's how they embed virus's into videos. Using the cmd ln. you can drop rar files into a video. Then send it. the other person recieving just renames the video to rar and unload it's contents. I've tested the technique before but it's been a while. I think I encountered it from the artbbs site way back when. I wouldn't download anything that requires it from there any more.
Lucky
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
|
|