"Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in
news:oIWdnRPPEZDSNyvInZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
> On 27 Jul 2015 02:13 PM ,Weener <rs@wagner.com> wrote:
>> "Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in
>> news:vvidncehVLO4CivInZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com:
>>
>> > Any chance you found something you could use?
>> > Lucky
>> >
>>
>> Yes I did :)
>>
>> 43,48,57,58,60 all marked n. I don't expect you to post those thouugh
>> :)
>>
>> Can you look at your 064 cstm. I think you might have some regular no
>> logo pics mixed in there. They will be smaller size, with no exif. If
>> so I can post the clean set.
>>
>> This PicCheck comparison is wiggin me out a little, It shows files
>> that you need, but when I look them up in your csv, you have them. I
>> quess I don't know exactly how it works yet or it has a bug.
>>
>> We have a bunch of sets that are different sizes. Maybe you got those
>> somewhere else and they are not originals. Maybe I get you to post
>> one so we can compare them some time. I'm sure mine are originals
>> because I made my csv's from Tat's master csv a looong time ago :)
>>
>> Something's weird with our set 030's too but I have to rest my brain,
>> LOL
>>
>> Before I forget, you have some customs named as regular sets:
>>
>> Your:
>> m042_005 is m042_005 (cstm 2002-06-28) - 112 pics
>> m042_015 is m042_015 (cstm 2002-09-20) - 81 pics
>> m042_021 is m042_021 (cstm 2003-02-07) - 124 pics this set is
>> duplicated in your cstm csv.
>> m042_033 is m042_033 (cstm 2003-07-11) - 103 pics
>> m042_035 is m042_035 (cstm 2003-03-14) - 122 pics this set is
>> duplicated in your cstm csv.
>>
>> Regular sets for the above
>>
>> Some No Logo sets:
>>
>> Your:
>> m042_164 is No Logo
>> 171-172 are no logo and a bunch of the sets that follow.
>>
>> In set m042_121 (cstm 2004-12-11) - 70 pics, you have 3 pics with
>> logos 007,015,020. They are duplicates of 008,018,024 in the regular
>> set. YOu can delete those.
>>
>> And that 074 (768x1024) and 74 (Web) nologo are the same.
>>
>> Weener
>
>
> Weener
> Sorry about that, I'm a little embarrassed about that mess. It's a
> folder I've procrastinated much too long.
>
> You were right about the 064cstm. Thanks I fixed it no need to post.
> Also fixed set 030, had some cstm mixxed in. I once said I was like a
> dumpster diver. I gathered my sets any way I could. Most came from
> torrents. When a torrent didn't come through all of the way I would
> keep what was good and add on to it. So yeah, I guess I'd better learn
> how to use pic check. Thank's for looking at those. Do you know the
> trick of combining rar's with a video? If so I would gladly post some
> vids with n files inside. Lucky
>
I don't think I've ever heard of combining rar's with a video, unless
I'm overlooking something.
Weener
|
|