Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 03:58:47 -0500
From: katyalover <back@home.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels
Subject: Re: Katya m020/y017 question and request
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:58:49 +0100
Message-ID: <upk2q9du7r4jjvllljsg9sl50o9r3190gj@4ax.com>
References: <Z7OdnVKZc4FSSj3OnZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 18
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-spQPnVcrLG2r4qbcqquIr0s6zERTqEng0HIkYagUtGrRkMHdGwngacPcC6JUiaZbmB618vIybfZAvxR!E9+rnB/j4g7qnoFNMpORQuAZusW0b21YoVS268xlEqVQ3dunW7Z0YhMlWoN/8p3YWy4wU7Y=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1689
X-Received-Body-CRC: 223440225
X-Received-Bytes: 2047
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.vladmodels:161
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:05:35 -0500, "Lucky" <LuckyLou@lizardlick.com>
wrote:
>The question is would any of Katya's sets be considered m020, and if so, where is the cutoff?
>The request is for set 002
Is set 2 available? I only have the previews, which I can post.
I lack sets:
2 5 6 7 8
10 11 14 16 18 19
20 22 23 26 27 28 29
30
I think she was m020 until the numbered sets were issued in 2002, when
she was reclassified as y017. A good rule of thumb is to regard all
her numbered sets as y017 and all others m020.I see that I haven't
done that though.
I'll post some stuff when I have resorted my collection!
|
|