On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:15:36 -0400, Ma <Doff@Modo.de> wrote:
>On 2015-06-20 17:29:18 +0000, LAKing@NHAx.net said:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:01:05 -0400, Ma <Doff@Modo.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-06-18 21:19:05 +0000, yamas said:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:21:31 -0400, Ma wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lurkers that can't figure out the password lol
>>>>
>>>> only assholes post in PWP 7-zip which require you to download everything
>>>> before you try deciphering any fucking password, I guess you're an
>>>> asshole as well as a troll
>>>
>>> Thank you for leeching and trolling our fine group. And also for your
>>> warm comments. The Passworded protected post were disscused and decided
>>> as a trial by a group of people who actually contribute to the group
>>> and is in testing. The passwords are easy to find unless your IQ is
>>> below say like what a Plankton's would be. With that being said I will
>>> leave you to see if you can prove yourself smarter than a plankton.
>>>
>>> Ma
>>
>> It's the nature of usenet. No one really owns a group. My guess is
>> the majority of users don't post. If you want to call them leechers
>> and lurkers, fine. I didn't see the entire thread, but mocking
>> someone that asks for help (maybe it wasn't asked nicely, don't know)
>> just invites more trash talking.
>
>I've started many groups on Usenet, wrote the charters and sent out the
>requests for the group to news admins explaining the need for the
>group's existence, both moderated and unmoderated and I will claim
>ownership of all those groups. A collective of a group's contributers
>once abandoned by it's original owner and or moderators may also claim
>the group, rewrite it's charter, rules or write the news admins to have
>the group removed due to it's no longer relevance or it beening taken
>over by spammers.
<shrug> still looks like no one really owns the groups, even if
they're successful in creating (and deleting them).
|
|