On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 18:44:53 -0500, "Lucky"
<LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote:
>
>On 07 Mar 2015 06:30 AM ,FALA <FarAway@ndLongAgo.com> wrote:
>> On 07 Mar 2015 08:48:15 GMT, Lucky
>> <Lucky@Lizardlick.high.overbyhotbush> wrote:
>>
>> >Some thoughts are to list her as an "N" series and maybe if there are more we could just go that way. I looked until I was blue in the face for her on the wayback machine. I don't know. She was according to this exif here just missed. She is definitely though, a cutey. I have made purchasing her sets a priority. So I'll let you know asap.
>> > Lucky
>> >
>> Starting with the clothes, the top is one worn by m039 set 4, though
>> this was 2002. Socks similar to m051 set 44, if tinge of photos
>> allowed for, and certainly y161 set 1. You can look for the skirt and
>> gloves! We need a new index, of clothes.
>> Not sure what this proves.
>That's what I'm trying to figure out. I went to the new Vladmodels site. They bought the old site, and agency. They are running a site called Custom Teens and trying to raise money by selling the old photos. This is considered (by them) one of the old photos. We, the group have never seen her. The EXIF reads 2007. That reads well with the back grounds. The clothes are used by almost all of the models. Even Olga in the Green Bikini is possible. I looked, but I'm not in the VIP bracket (Too rich for me). There are a few models that were on the cusp of the end of the old site that we never saw. Do we include them as Vlad models. Look how many have the Webmodels Logo. Age is what I believe kept her out of that site. Search for m064 107. Is that a Vlad model? I hope you see my point. To me the question is how do we label her? With the "N" unless someone can find another.
> Lucly
>
I was just making the point that the clothes suggests this is a
genuine product of the vlad studio. After all the stool (and the green
bikini for that matter) are not so unique and appear in other model
series.
|
|