"Lucky" <LuckyLou@Lizardlick.Hotbush> wrote in
news:NtOdnS11SqNYh1PJnZ2dnUU7-emdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
> On 31 Jan 2015 03:02 PM ,CarlG <carlg@fasfpost.net> wrote:
>> Lucky..this is what I recovered from Astraweb..hope its what you
>> want. Carlg
> Thank you CarlG. Very interesting that while still not the complete
> set, you did get more and some different. The only one Giga got that
> Astra didn't was the 1st picture. Astra was able to get 7 more
> pictures than Giga. Combined I now own 46 of the 51 pics in the set.
> I'll get some CSV's made and post them for you. I think we are
> probably running into the same problems yet could help each other
> complete on many sets.
> LL
> As to Hello Kiddie's question, according to what I have read from an
> earlier post from Katyalover, the earlier sets commonly had the exif
> and/or no logo. These were labeled as set 1 but in reality she only
> had the pics on 1 cd. I forget the cd number and the exact count but
> I'll guess here and say cd7 and 350+ on the photo count. If you
> really want to understand it I would recommend looking at any post
> Katyalover did. He is a professor for the group as far as any
> information on history or technology are concerned. He knows
> photography.
> Lucky
>
>
Hi Lucky, 46 pics is all that set had when I found it. The last pic is
numbered 51, but 46 total is all I posted. Looks like you got them all :)
Weener
|
|