Gumby Gump <gumby.gump@domain.invalid> wrote in
news:53635fe7$0$15404$c3e8da3$26f9d57d@news.astraweb.com:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:26:33 +0000, not me wrote:
>
>> [...]alternate archiver works well
>> with image files 20-30% size reduction compaired to rars almost no
>> reduction
>
> This is unimportant as far as size goes. What _is_ important is how
> the format behaves.
>
> If it is not possible to extract a sample from a split SITx archive
> where you only have access to the first part, then its usefulness on
> Usenet is questionable.
>
> And please, no self-extracting crap! Not everybody uses windoze, and
> broken virus infestations like that.
And not everyone uses lame nicknames for things he doesn't like...over
and over and over ad nauseum.
|
|
 1 file - "blujeane 123 sets archives alternate archiver works well with image files 20-30% size reduction compaired to rars almost no reduction.JPG" yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}