On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:26:33 +0000, not me wrote:
> [...]alternate archiver works well
> with image files 20-30% size reduction compaired to rars almost no
> reduction
This is unimportant as far as size goes. What _is_ important is how the
format behaves.
If it is not possible to extract a sample from a split SITx archive where
you only have access to the first part, then its usefulness on Usenet is
questionable.
And please, no self-extracting crap! Not everybody uses windoze, and
broken virus infestations like that.
--
Gumby Gump
|
|
 [1/1] - "blujeane 123 sets archives alternate archiver works well with image files 20-30% size reduction compaired to rars almost no reduction.JPG" yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}