Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: OddBALL <odd@ball.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic
Subject: Re: Ned 'quality' vs. Maxim 1 file - "mary_t_model_mix_teenmodeling_tv_002.jpg" yEnc (01/14)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:58:40 -0700
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <l9vrs9pk58bl4qls7jjjm3ojs8p6ebe53a@4ax.com>
References: <53cd3fd9$1$58728$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Received-Bytes: 1066
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1078321656
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic:272
On 21 Jul 2014 16:29:16 GMT, ricky@example.org (Ricky) wrote:
So you pull the worst Ned shot and compare to the best Nick shot and
that's your proof?
C'mon, what the real beef here? Just because there is a blue
background you think it's so much better? Did you know that Ned has
many picture sets with different background? No, you don't know that
because you're talking out of your ass, like all trolls do. You just
like to troll and not base your findings on reality.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic/272h', 'Re: Ned 'quality' vs. Maxim 1 file - "mary_t_model_mix_teenmodeling_tv_002.jpg" yEnc (01/14)')){kind=link}