On 22 Jul 2014 01:35:15 GMT, Millard Filmore
<hibbert@jackson.county.org> wrote:
>On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:30:19 -0700, OddBALL wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:41:02 +0300, Ricky <ricky@example.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:43:00 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 06:33:19 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 08:24:23 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:51:11 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Too old now. She's done. Put a cow bell around her neck and send her
>>>>>>off to the fields.
>>>>>
>>>>>Come on OB, you know when a girl becomes
>>>>> "too old" for we pervs well <bg>
>>>>>
>>>>>Anyway, tell Ned that last Mary's set, in the dark background section,
>>>>>is ok, please. White background is awful instead, it makes subjects
>>>>>flat, washing away all light effects.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Nah,white background is good.
>>>
>>>No, while elonafan is an annoying cunt he's right about the white
>>>background problem in Ned's sets.
>>>
>>>It's no coincidence that these other photographers who know what they're
>>>doing never uses all white backgrounds.
>>>
>>>Ned is also lacking in photo editing and processing skills. Photos are
>>>grainy and some of the samples posted here are awfully compressed.
>>>
>>>I would _never_ spend my hard earned money on something so bad.
>>
>>
>> White background is fine and the samples here are just that: SAMPLES.
>> They are not the full size high res photos. The full size ones average
>> 6mb each. Too large to post here.
>>
>> But you cheap bastards wouldn't know that becuase you never buy
>> anything.
>
>hi oddball,
>
>a low grade sample may be good for the web page that allows a purchaser
>know what he is getting, but a bad sample is bad advertising.
>
>my suggestion, and i am not an expert in any form here, is to post at
>least one sample of what a purchaser would really get from a set.
>
>maybe just one is good enough for advertising, maybe the first pic of a
>few sets. the number to post is whatever works best for you. another
>possibility is to put a full size pic on the model web site ... perhaps
>one is already there.
>
>i have seen some very large pics come through the satin news group in the
>transistor series. is the problem with your posting software?
Hi Milnard.
Very good suggestion but it's already being done. There is a full
size, high res sample available in Ned's samples, in fact there's a
few of them.
There are also many Ned sets that are shot outdoors, in living rooms
and against different colored backgrounds.
That's what gets me about these trolls, they bitch and moan about
things that simply are not true. They just like to troll and start
arguments. That's all this is. If they actually wrote and asked for
the link to the sample pics, they would see that there are high res
samples and many different backgrounds.
But they would rather troll and argue.
No matter, the fact is that very few people that are on here actually
buy sets. They just pirate them.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic/271', 'Re: She's baaAAACK !! - "elonavarsitypreview.jpg" (1/7) 1.0 MBytes yEnc')){kind=link}