On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:38:48 +0000, zup wrote:
> model.fan <model.fan_member@newsguy.com> wrote in news:
>> OMG - I guess it's been a while since I checked back in. This
>> discussion has become a circle-jerk of rightwing reactionaries. Love
>> how you guys relive only the past you want to cherry-pick. Have at it
>> - keep pumpin' those little pricks of yours....
>
> Hell with it, since we're here, I should point out that 1965 called and
> it wants its politics back. "Reactionaries". Really? Am I in Mao's
> China?
>
> Socialism is dead, discredited, failed, buried to everyone but you and
> the, ahem, president. Deal with it, dude.
yeah, only under socialism would crooked banksters be able to lose a few
trillion dollars, right? and then get the government to bail them out.
that could only happen under a corrupt socialist republican president.
capitalism, socialism, all just a label for who gets to loot the middle
class.
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|