alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopicPrev. Next
Re: She's baaAAACK !! - "elonavarsitypreview.jpg" (1/7) 1.0 MBytes yEnc Unlimited download news ..
Millard Filmore (hibbert@jackson.county.org) 2014/07/21 19:35

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Millard Filmore <hibbert@jackson.county.org>
Subject: Re: She's baaAAACK !! - "elonavarsitypreview.jpg" (1/7) 1.0 MBytes
 yEnc
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic
References: <68cks917bpa664762oqf75r6appuvgietm@4ax.com>
 <hc3ls99afscrtr690vhtl754s5qb64isrl@4ax.com>
 <sbgms99t4pekj7f4c8c8cgkasa2c8ao7cg@4ax.com>
 <acsns95h50o8ocv28aqcjefujhvi7idf1b@4ax.com>
 <odnps99snl0c0415rofvml1ff0g7rgqfsp@4ax.com>
 <ls8qs95o33vo0innlq4rf5vdflql6ah503@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Pan/0.136 (I'm far too busy being delicious; GIT 926a150
 git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 22 Jul 2014 01:35:15 GMT
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <53cdbfd3$0$61280$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com>
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4b4b25de.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=YFn_jQ>d<]nf3Y_QHDVbKhL?0kYOcDh@jd2UQJO4H<Pei<Mg6XalR7`;n^U31oXNSj<1eCP]1EQ4dM`8EMdG<iWde;hBRoOOcli:bJ1c^`>Ihn
X-Received-Bytes: 3469
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4066215599
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic:268

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:30:19 -0700, OddBALL wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:41:02 +0300, Ricky <ricky@example.org> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:43:00 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 06:33:19 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 08:24:23 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:51:11 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Too old now. She's done. Put a cow bell around her neck and send her
>>>>>off to the fields.
>>>>
>>>>Come on OB, you know when a girl becomes
>>>> "too old" for we pervs well <bg>
>>>>
>>>>Anyway, tell Ned that last Mary's set, in the dark background section,
>>>>is ok, please. White background is awful instead, it makes subjects
>>>>flat, washing away all light effects.
>>>
>>>
>>>Nah,white background is good.
>>
>>No, while elonafan is an annoying cunt he's right about the white
>>background problem in Ned's sets.
>>
>>It's no coincidence that these other photographers who know what they're
>>doing never uses all white backgrounds.
>>
>>Ned is also lacking in photo editing and processing skills. Photos are
>>grainy and some of the samples posted here are awfully compressed.
>>
>>I would _never_ spend my hard earned money on something so bad.
>
>
> White background is fine and the samples here are just that: SAMPLES.
> They are not the full size high res photos. The full size ones average
> 6mb each. Too large to post here.
>
> But you cheap bastards wouldn't know that becuase you never buy
> anything.

hi oddball,

a low grade sample may be good for the web page that allows a purchaser
know what he is getting, but a bad sample is bad advertising.

my suggestion, and i am not an expert in any form here, is to post at
least one sample of what a purchaser would really get from a set.

maybe just one is good enough for advertising, maybe the first pic of a
few sets.  the number to post is whatever works best for you.  another
possibility is to put a full size pic on the model web site ... perhaps
one is already there.

i have seen some very large pics come through the satin news group in the
transistor series.  is the problem with your posting software?

Follow-ups:123456789101112131415
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite