On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:30:19 -0700, OddBALL wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:41:02 +0300, Ricky <ricky@example.org> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:43:00 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 06:33:19 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 08:24:23 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:51:11 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Too old now. She's done. Put a cow bell around her neck and send her
>>>>>off to the fields.
>>>>
>>>>Come on OB, you know when a girl becomes
>>>> "too old" for we pervs well <bg>
>>>>
>>>>Anyway, tell Ned that last Mary's set, in the dark background section,
>>>>is ok, please. White background is awful instead, it makes subjects
>>>>flat, washing away all light effects.
>>>
>>>
>>>Nah,white background is good.
>>
>>No, while elonafan is an annoying cunt he's right about the white
>>background problem in Ned's sets.
>>
>>It's no coincidence that these other photographers who know what they're
>>doing never uses all white backgrounds.
>>
>>Ned is also lacking in photo editing and processing skills. Photos are
>>grainy and some of the samples posted here are awfully compressed.
>>
>>I would _never_ spend my hard earned money on something so bad.
>
>
> White background is fine and the samples here are just that: SAMPLES.
> They are not the full size high res photos. The full size ones average
> 6mb each. Too large to post here.
>
> But you cheap bastards wouldn't know that becuase you never buy
> anything.
hi oddball,
a low grade sample may be good for the web page that allows a purchaser
know what he is getting, but a bad sample is bad advertising.
my suggestion, and i am not an expert in any form here, is to post at
least one sample of what a purchaser would really get from a set.
maybe just one is good enough for advertising, maybe the first pic of a
few sets. the number to post is whatever works best for you. another
possibility is to put a full size pic on the model web site ... perhaps
one is already there.
i have seen some very large pics come through the satin news group in the
transistor series. is the problem with your posting software?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic/268', 'Re: She's baaAAACK !! - "elonavarsitypreview.jpg" (1/7) 1.0 MBytes yEnc')){kind=link}