Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: OddBALL <odd@ball.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic
Subject: Re: WOW !! Polina !! Dark backgrounds are better, see Gabrielle's set too - polina 150.jpg (0/1) - DSC_0222.jpg (0/1)
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:20:54 -0700
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <mcq8r9trndiot0907c9mdca9teuagfabb1@4ax.com>
References: <eq67r9haf58cn8amhpsilgbf8agb8o0r9v@4ax.com> <ikd8r957lj8m2gr7bn4qhh0v4n7f8n40qj@4ax.com> <atd8r914sdi62jnh00k6d8vkbqj6tdp1jq@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Received-Bytes: 1699
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3513208152
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.sierra.offtopic:203
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:48:05 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:44:35 -0700, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 08:10:19 +0200, elonafan@almaty.city wrote:
>>
>>>IMHO white and bright background with selective focus on model makes
>>>the pictures flat, all is bidimensional, there is no shade and light
>>>effect. This Polina's set and previous Gabrielle set are quite
>>>perfect.
>>>
>>>lnfn
>>
>>I disagree.
>>
>>True admirers of the models want the best focus, color, and lighting
>>on the model and the background is merely a distraction.
>>
>>But it's ok to agree to disagree.
>
>
>Here's Polina's boobs:
Who's looking at backgrounds? Would this be better against a white
studio background or this setting?
It's more difficult to control the lighting outdoors, hence all the
shitty outdoor pictures out of Russia. Pictures like this are
difficult and time consuming to do. Is it worth it for a more
interesting background?
|
|
 - DSC_0222.jpg (0/1)')){kind=link}