> On 22 Sep 2008 23:52:05 -0500, getaclue@tots.org wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:01:09 -0700, Da'Tooth <atooth@dafront.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the posts especially #7 now which is new to me...If anyone else
>>> is
>>> like me I'm most happy to see any new faces-poses from the Mag-Fash gals
>>> whatever the filenames end up being ; )
>>>
>>> Unless someone makes a concerted effort to post a site rip of these beauts
>>> we'll never see them intact.
>>>
>>> We're damned lucky sites like M-F, Webeweb, SchMods, TinyMods, etc.
>>> kick-out
>>> tons of girls and tons of shots AFAIAC
>>>
>>> What I like most about M-F is they seem to shoot a series of pre-set poses
>>> from similar angles with all the girls so we can usually count on that
>>> "special" pose from each ~:)))
>>>
>>> Thanks again for your efforts here - there and of course, everywhere...
>>
>> LOL! It's not the site naming...it's the incessant RE-NAMING that
>> makes MF unintelligible. Did these come "as is", from the site?? No.
>> If everyone would learn how to handle duplicate file names...without
>> fucking with them, we would ALL be better off. And, for those series
>> with ridiculous filenames (of which I doubt any are original), learn
>> to post "one at a time" instead of the stupid, worthless floods you
>> keep insisting on.
>>
>> Jeez, I thought more people knew how this worked, by know?
>>
>> I certainly appreciate the "posts". The "floods" of similarly named
>> files, however, suck. Show some control and post one series at a time?
>
>
> The only MF I have ever subbed to was the Super Issue, I never posted
> that site rip as a zip file because I rarely have had the space to
> manipulate a 10 G + file (well over 5G but I would need 10+ G
> available to zip the files). I did however post the file names as they
> appeared on the site.
>
> The MF rips I have posted had been advertised as complete, I remember
> one corrupt file in the first or second issue so far, and I remember
> checking it across 2 or 3 different sources. The names can get changed
> for (I'm sure) a few reasons. If I were to post a complete site rip
> zipped you would end up with probably at least a hundred different
> folders with about 10-20 files in each, not to mention another folder
> containing about 10 to 20 sets of folders.(Later issues had fewer
> pics/sets). I would rather not have to change folders myself to view
> less the 20 pics at a time, but that's not an excuse for the
> filenames. The fact that I posted these files as they were contained
> in their zips is my excuse.
>
> Many of the pics would have duplicate file names. If I post the Issue
> unzipped and you downloaded them to a single folder, they your
> newsreader would handle them (likely) one of two ways. Either it would
> overwrite the files with duplicate file names, or it would rename the
> files to a similar scheme as what you are seeing posted. I suspect
> site ripping software would handle the files similarly, but it would
> also allow the option to maintain the paths for the files, mine did
> anyway.
>
> I posted my Super Issue (way back when) and included the path when I
> was posting it so if you wanted to go through the effort you could d/l
> them to their rightful place, but that was likely not the easiest way
> to retrieve either.
>
> I know TI posted a large amount of these issues a year or two ago, (TI
> I beleive, perhaps Fachan, one of the big 3 over in yab), I am sure
> some of my sets are from them, and others are from other methods.
>
> If you have read the posts, I believe you would see, that I am not
> insisting, or have not insisted on any floods, I am merely filling
> requests with what I have. I can post the zip files but I think all
> would agree that not every MF model is for everyone, so by posting the
> files singularly, people can decide to d/l what they want as best as I
> am able to allow them without spending hours sorting them. Also the
> file names in my zips are exactly as I have posted (so far) because it
> was others who did not maintain the integrity of the filename. If you
> would like to sort them for folks, and repost them, I suspect few
> would object. Or perhaps that would take too much effort on your
> behalf, but not mine.
Nobody needs to expalin to the pissy little leeches, thanks for whatever u
post
--
Hang 'Em High For A Few Fistful Of Dollars More - The Good, The Bad & The
RepUgly :)
|
|