Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pull-news.sonic-news.com!not-for-mail
From: =?iso-8859-5?b?1NZv4NY=?= <djordj@heavens.not>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.purebeauty
Subject: Re: If you haven't seen these yet, you want to. CTOP.
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:47:56 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <268b5d.ri1.17.2@news.alt.net>
References: <Xns9B128499F4125katmandu@216.196.97.131>
<Xns9B12C5A8EBD4tastethehoneycomb@216.151.153.13>
<howling-85AA57.20215110092008@news-europe.giganews.com>
<2673ju.k96.17.4@news.alt.net>
<howling-C8570A.09584611092008@news.giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.purebeauty:107
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:58:46 -0700, lunar psycho wrote:
> In article <2673ju.k96.17.4@news.alt.net>, ‰ÊoÊ <djordj@heavens.not>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:21:52 -0700, lunar psycho wrote:
>>
>> > In article <Xns9B12C5A8EBD4tastethehoneycomb@216.151.153.13>,
>> > swarmer <swarmer@thehive.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "k@man.du" <k@man.du> wrote in news:Xns9B128499F4125katmandu@
>> >> 216.196.97.131:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Enjoy.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Oh, I enjoyed it all right! Is that all there is for the table
>> >> dance, just over a minute? Crap! Thanks alot for this much anyway.
>> >>
>> >> swrmr
>> >
>> > Point of information. I don't mean to whet or enflame the fires of
>> > unrequited lust, but there is indeed more to this video. while there
>> > is no physical contact, there is nudity akin to and every bit as
>> > complete as some Showstars videos. And, there is more than enuf
>> > suggestive dancing to qualify for pedoporno. I have seen this in its
>> > entirety some years back. I believe it was posted in hussy near then
>> > end of that groups viable life span. She is a very precocious
>> > dancer.
>> >
>> > lunar psycho
>>
>>
>> FYI showstars videos existed for no reason but to stir those flames.
>> This is obviously a real film with an attempt at a real message.
>> There's plenty of pedoerotica in Pretty Baby too, but there's a reason
>> it's sold at amazon and showstars isn't.
>>
>> Enough of the legal claptrap, what's the name of the movie?
>
> Well, for one, i find your abrasive attitude repelling. I was not
> posting to assault anyone with "legal claptrap" and you would do well to
> desist from instigating flame wars with your caustic, condescending, and
> ludicrously demanding personality, dude.
>
> Secondly, I was merely pointing out that, indeed, this a much bigger
> movie, to those who were asking for more information about it. What is
> seen here is just a chopped up few slices of it designed to accentuate
> one facet of the theme of the movie, then retitled to pander to and
> titillate those with that taste in entertainment. Not to say that it is
> base or even illegal in my eyes (I tend to gravitate towards BD,
> Vladmodels, and LS material, myself, finding it gorgeous and the heights
> of the genre)
>
> I remembered more, especially which group it was posted in (and could
> most probably be found again, as it is a still-functioning and
> flourishing group), but since you are obviously indicative of, and
> speaking for, the personnel here, I think it best if I stay away from
> this group. I was only here looking for a certain ShowStar flick and
> happened to see the post and the questions about it and thought I might
> be of some help.
>
> Have a nice day with yourself.
>
> lp
ROTFL. All you left out was "I know you are, what am I?"
Jeezus dude, get over yourself.
|
|