Re: Zup, why don't you compress them a little, like this? - "38427293eCt.jpg" 784.6 kBytes yEnc |
Altopia Corp. - Usenet A .. |
Vladimir (Vladimir@RedSquare.ru) |
2015/01/17 20:44 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Vladimir <Vladimir@RedSquare.ru>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.purebeauty
Subject: Re: Zup, why don't you compress them a little, like this? - "38427293eCt.jpg" 784.6 kBytes yEnc
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:44:07 +1300
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <180120151644070191%Vladimir@RedSquare.ru>
References: <5493454a$0$46546$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com> <54958006$0$22825$b1db1813$d2f06f9f@news.astraweb.com> <XnsA409C12D787E3zupnowhere@74.209.131.13>
Reply-To: Vladimir <vladimir@RedSquare.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
x-no-archive: yes
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2897332498
X-Received-Bytes: 1731
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.purebeauty:1063
In article <XnsA409C12D787E3zupnowhere@74.209.131.13>, zup
<zup@nowhere> wrote:
> yamas <yamas@bloodyhell.no.way> wrote in news:
> > or, it could be that contrary to you morons he knows that jpeg is a
> > lossy compression format and wants to get the most out of his photos
> > and that his camera might not have a raw setting, or he hasn't
> > discovered it yet
>
>
> They're not my photos, I found them somewhere. Also you're correct that I
> am concerned about losing image quality if I compressed them.
>
I'm with you and the other guy who shares your view. As a pro
photographer, I would never post small, shitty jpgs which deprive
aficionados of the ability to appreciate large, data-rich versions.
Lovers of small pics can delete all the data they want; lovers of big
pics can't go the other way.
|
|
|