| Re: Zup, why don't you compress them a little, like this? - "38427293eCt.jpg" 784.6 kBytes yEnc |
UseNetServer.com |
| zup (zup@nowhere) |
2014/12/20 16:57 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.purebeauty
Subject: Re: Zup, why don't you compress them a little, like this? - "38427293eCt.jpg" 784.6 kBytes yEnc
From: zup <zup@nowhere>
References: <5493454a$0$46546$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com> <54958006$0$22825$b1db1813$d2f06f9f@news.astraweb.com>
Message-ID: <XnsA409C12D787E3zupnowhere@74.209.131.13>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
Organization: UseNetServer.com
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 23:57:13 +0000
Lines: 10
X-Trace: 6f87d54960cd981dcaba05687
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1606340683
X-Received-Bytes: 1188
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.purebeauty:1056
yamas <yamas@bloodyhell.no.way> wrote in news:
> or, it could be that contrary to you morons he knows that jpeg is a
> lossy compression format and wants to get the most out of his photos
> and that his camera might not have a raw setting, or he hasn't
> discovered it yet
They're not my photos, I found them somewhere. Also you're correct that I
am concerned about losing image quality if I compressed them.
|
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.purebeauty/1056h', 'Re: Zup, why don't you compress them a little, like this? - "38427293eCt.jpg" 784.6 kBytes yEnc')){kind=link}