Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!enother.net!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx16.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joet5 <joet5@optonline.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.military
Subject: Re: 1940-09-27 CL UK HMS Phoebe1941orLater.jpg
Message-ID: <k3lar9h6t9rfj03agq8u48q2u90142mve7@4ax.com>
References: <a7r7r9d4c5ism4jr4tpu0murj8b41t1fc0@4ax.com> <bbc8r9l5uj1nsi3ivi2kek6fujq3mj7226@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cv.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 13:04:35 UTC
Organization: Optimum Online
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:04:41 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 1214
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1349235177
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.military:41
I don't know which is correct, Maybe the IWM can answer that question.
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:28:36 -0700, Ed Loomis <TangoBear@nospam.com>
wrote:
>On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 08:06:49 -0400, Joseph Testagrose <Joet5@optonline.net>
>wrote:
>
>Hi Joe,
>
> The image you posted above is the same shot of the same ship you posted
>
>as: 1940-09-30 CL UK HMS Dido1940orLater.jpg.
>
>Is there any chance of determining if this is indeed HMS Phoebe or HMS Dido?
>
>Thanks for all the posts Joe, you're the champ!
>
>Ed
|
|
){kind=link}