Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.military
Subject: Re: Russian tank snowplows
Message-ID: <qav4jal0e86b87h8k5qnmptqmd2k7q98o2@4ax.com>
References: <Sb2dnV_o359jXazInZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <XnsA4806C1E7520HortenzyFortensnort@216.166.97.131>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
X-No-Archive: YES
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-No-Record: YES
Lines: 15
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:52:37 +0000
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2343557174
X-Received-Bytes: 1455
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.military:1332
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:38:15 -0500, Andrew Chaplin
<ab.chaplin@yourfinger.rogers.com> wrote:
>"Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote in news:Sb2dnV_o359jXazInZ2dnUU7-L-
>dnZ2d@earthlink.com:
>
>>
>
>The first "tank" looked to be an armoured engineering vehicle. The second
>was an MBT (T72?) of some description, but not out of control.
Not to mention that is a very expensive way to plow a road, what's the fuel
efficiency 1 - 2 mpg?
Looked a little small for a T72, but maybe.
|
|