Not everyone in the world lives in USA.
I think that Erinnerung has already done what you suggest i your last
paragraph.
But nice to know that you have such insight into and control over the
development and deployment of communicaton infrastructure that you can
foretell what will happen in the future.
Refreshing, also, to see that egotism and unconcern for the needs of
others still flourishes . . .
On 28 Jan 2015 04:19:22 GMT, Frank Colessi <root@localhost.locldomain>
wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:53:25 +0000, Harry R Jumpjet wrote:
>
>> While size might matter, do not lose sight of the
>> factthat some of us have less-than-light-speed internet connectoons,
>> and/or are limited in our download allowance.
>>
>
>I cannot believe that this argument is still being put forth.
>It may have been appropriate twenty years ago but it should
>be completely defunct today.
>
>One thousand images at 2.5 megabytes per image works out to
>only 2.5 gigabytes. In the USA even the cheapest broadband
>has monthly download caps of 250 gigabytes. Furthermore, as
>improved technology is disseminated even these limits will
>be vastly improved.
>
>Anyway, for sluggish connections there are always torrents and lower-res
>image sizes can easily be created from high-res originals to accommodate
>the dwindling few that will demand them.
|
|