Girls, girls, girls,
Can we please stop gurning (old Ulster word for moaning or complaning)
about size. While size might matter, do not lose sight of the
factthat some of us have less-than-light-speed internet connectoons,
and/or are limited in our download allowance.
<here@glorious-somerset.uk> wrote:
>On 24/01/2015 23:40, Frank Colossi wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe Mr Colessi could direct us to some of his past contributions or,
>>> failing which, will contribute some of his own works in order to show
>>> the rest of us how it should be done.
>>>
>>> I'm sure that he won't mind some critical analysis, given that he seems
>>> happy to hand it out.
>>>
>>
>> Most certainly. Unlike most others, it seems, I welcome criticism and
>> I am not at all offended by harshness or severity. In fact, I find that
>> "rudeness" and honest integrity often go hand-in-hand.
>>
>> Attached are two images across two posts that demonstrate the great
>> difference that high resolution can make.
>>
>> The second image shows the same scene as the first image.
>>
>> This second image was scanned from the photographic print at 600 dpi
>> and demonstrates the minimum effective resolution for any kind of
>> serious presentation.
>>
>> Note how the complex details, which were completely lost in the 150 dpi
>> version, now become vibrantly alive. The folds on each uniform are
>> quite discernible as well as the nature of the equipment. One can
>> almost feel as if one were walking directly among these soldiers.
>> The image is truly satisfying.
>>
>> Again, to best appreciate the grandeur of this resolution (2704x2128)
>> be sure that your software does not automatically resize the image on
>> your screen.
>>
>>
>
>However, given the size of this latter picture I'm sure that many, if
>postings were being made in their many hundreds at this size, would not
>even bother to get past the first couple.
>
>Nonetheless, I give you full marks for your "mine is bigger than yours"
>mentality.
|
|