>On 18/01/2015 19:10, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>> On 18 Jan 2015 18:24:23 GMT, Frank Colessi <root@localhost.locldomain> wrote:
>>
>>> On 18/01/2015 16:52, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> your initial post was nothing but rude and without any
>>>> gratitude for all of the hard work.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you sometimes donate food at your local pantry for all
>>> the needy people in your area?
>>>
>>> Well, if you show up with a case of diet soda and some bags
>>> of marshmallows, the pantry officials will, rudely or
>>> otherwise, reject your kind offer on the grounds that
>>> it does not fulfill basic nutritional requirements.
>>>
>>> (Sure. I don't care if you drove 100 miles to deliver
>>> it. Get that junk out of here.)
>>>
>>> Before you donate, understand the proper way of doing
>>> it.
>>>
>>> This kind of stuff is everywhere. Youtube videos with
>>> extremely poor compression and annoyingly inconsistent
>>> audio levels is just one example. News sites with postage-
>>> stamp-sized, underexposed, and out-of-focus images are
>>> another.
>>>
>>> The answer is simple: before you make a contribution
>>> understand the technology involved (or hire a consultant
>>> that will understand it for you). There are no constrains
>>> on Usenet. Take advantage of the freedom and let the
>>> huge bit streams flow
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You were abusive and rude. Own it son.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's all in the eye of the beholder.
>>
>>
>> And in the eye of this beholder, you are a rude, rationalizing little prick who
>> has not contributed a thing to this forum except vitriol, a.k.a. "A troll".
>>
>> You obviously skipped kindergarten as you never learned how to play nicely in
>> the sandbox with others.
>>
>> Erinnerungen's posts were extremely useful, educational and contributed
>> tremendously to re-invigorating this forum.
>>
>
>Maybe Mr Colessi could direct us to some of his past contributions or,
>failing which, will contribute some of his own works in order to show
>the rest of us how it should be done.
>
>I'm sure that he won't mind some critical analysis, given that he seems
>happy to hand it out.
Yeah, I am sure he will jump right on that. :-)
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 |
|