On 18/01/2015 16:52, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2015 16:41:15 GMT, Frank Colessi <root@localhost.locldomain> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:12:53 +0000, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If it is important enough for you to bitch about then I must assume it is
>>> important enough for you to actually do something about it?
>>>
>>
>> My response was not a "bitch" but a criticism. If you cannot tell
>> the difference then you should not be participating in a free
>> and open forum.
>>
>> People like you make a mockery out of rational communication
>> and intelligent debate.
>>
>>>
>>> Why don't you take the photographs and enhance them in Photoshop? Here are some
>>> instructions.
>>>
>>
>> Such brilliance is expected from someone as shallow as you.
>>
>> I won't even bother to explain the simple technical reasons
>> why your idea is utter nonsense.
>
> Frank, Frank, Frank, your initial post was nothing but rude and without any
> gratitude for all of the hard work.
>
> Saying, "It would have been helpful if you had scanned at 600 and posted at
> 2500x" could be considered a criticism. However, you said "I am sorry to say,
> but this collection verges on being totally useless." Which is the bitching of a
> troll.
>
> You were abusive and rude. Own it son.
>
+1
--
Moving Things In Stiil Pictures
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 |
|