Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:54:38 -0600
From: "Randy Tingley" <rtingley@nep.net>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.military
References: <rfvfbap3l7hqgoiqrc2gn0g95vr1om3khj@4ax.com> <pan.2015.01.18.06.59.24@localhost.locldomain> <dgbnbal7pqe8fap10akaiq3dkscaeh84p0@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <dgbnbal7pqe8fap10akaiq3dkscaeh84p0@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Images of the Eastern Front
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:54:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
Message-ID: <4smdnesAd76zVCbJnZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@posted.nepnet>
Lines: 55
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 23.235.24.115
X-Trace: sv3-2dBmyV29G5JdRhRCSUBZo6PlGqxvwdE0nBSD4UjQiO4Jo5fBmQSV0uvQpXQSh/XNgTjto1nC8sOfGQv!HS/spH3vxLiT4L0QGP5Po5Z24n/QDyWn4HAbod6t4Ob3luXQtE1FBAU5KuQS2DS/CT5x/OsbheKx!MK8P8/+A
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3464
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2882059997
X-Received-Bytes: 3748
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.military:1194
Yes, it was very nice to post all of these ... once again I can't thank you
enough.
Randy
"Charles Lindbergh" wrote in message
news:dgbnbal7pqe8fap10akaiq3dkscaeh84p0@4ax.com...
On 18 Jan 2015 06:59:21 GMT, Frank Colessi <root@localhost.locldomain>
wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:33:20 -0500, Erinnerungen wrote:
>
>> That's about all the photos, for now.
>>
>
>I concur with the others that the posting is valuable, but
>there is a serious shortcoming to the effort.
>
>The images are TOO SMALL. The average dimension is roughly
>700x700 which makes each of them about as impressive as a
>postage stamp. I am sorry to say, but this collection verges
>on being totally useless.
>
>A subject of such vast import deserves to be presented in a format
>of at least 2500x2500 resolution. Only with much larger images can
>all of the tremendous detail become blazingly discernible.
>Only with much greater resolution can these historical scenes
>become brilliantly alive.
>
>One may argue that significantly lager images would cause storage
>difficulties. This may be true if one still uses floppy disks, but
>with current hard drives and/or blu-ray optical disks the storage
>issue is meaningless. At 2500x2500 resolution and JPEG compression
>the entire collection could be stored in 4-5 gigabytes, which should
>be no problem for anyone.
>
>The original photos should have been scanned at 600 dpi and posted
>at 2500x2500 pixels. Who wants to view history from afar through
>a soda straw when total immersion is quite technically feasible?
Wow, talk about looking a gift horse in the mouth.
If it is important enough for you to bitch about then I must assume it is
important enough for you to actually do something about it?
Why don't you take the photographs and enhance them in Photoshop? Here are
some
instructions.
http://www.howtogeek.com/105952/3-simple-ways-to-improve-low-resolution-images-and-typography/
If you can't be bothered doing something about the situation, then I would
urge
you to shut the fuck up and stop trolling.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 |
|