alt.binaries.pictures.militaryPrev. Next
Re: 1942-02-22 FF UK HMS Albrighton1967asFGN RauleGiorgioArraPhoto.jpg
ŽiŠardo (here@glorious-somerset.uk) 2014/09/15 13:25

Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:25:20 -0500
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:25:20 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=AEi=A9ardo?= <here@glorious-somerset.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.military
Subject: Re: 1942-02-22 FF UK HMS Albrighton1967asFGN RauleGiorgioArraPhoto.jpg
References: <mbp51a52tnlakr8edn8vfbejs9sl82ed4f@4ax.com> <8t6dne_OkJ_F2o7JnZ2dnUVZ5qSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vf2dnYiOLvLo2YnJnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@giganews.com> <lv75hl01nnh@news6.newsguy.com>
In-Reply-To: <lv75hl01nnh@news6.newsguy.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <_Z6dnXqZkLa8oIrJnZ2dnUU7-bmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 36
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-lY3RB4VBMtaoAwKYUSNx7AWyUtt1cHLHEjaCQV/quQvLApZa0RaD1WXl+YKo/Tz7PDnaXPtZbrGHBYo!c8cRPxBSHA6iWY8Ct7vF6bAmT2N275PtGXgrK3IT5tb5QCDdb/tg9fLv0uQJf5cm3rpT0OCX7ak=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2984
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.military:100

On 15/09/2014 17:49, a425couple wrote:

>> On 12/09/2014 20:19, patricia@school.study wrote:
>>> is a Frigate smaller than a  destroyer?
>>
>> Yes.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_ship
>
> Generally, yes.
> But as that site points out, the USN did some really weird
> categories around the 1970s.
>
> USS California, nuclear powered, 10,600 tons, 587' long
> and they called it a frigate.
>
> from yours
> "From the 1950s to the 1970s, the United States Navy commissioned ships
> classed as guided missile frigates which were actually anti-aircraft
> warfare cruisers built on destroyer-style hulls. Some of these ships-the
> Bainbridge, Truxtun, California and Virginia classes-were
> nuclear-powered. These "frigates" were roughly mid-way in size between
> cruisers and destroyers. This was similar to the use of the term
> "frigate" during the age of sail during which it referred to a
> medium-sized warship, but it was inconsistent with conventions used by
> other contemporary navies which regarded frigates as being smaller than
> destroyers. During the 1975 ship reclassification, the large American
> frigates were redesignated as cruisers or destroyers, while ocean
> escorts (the American classification for ships smaller than destroyers)
> were renamed as frigates."

So it all came right in the end.

;-)

--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

Follow-ups:1234567
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite