> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 18:10:55 -0600, retrowavelength
> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>> news:nN2dnXdz17gbJ4vBnZ2dnUU7-fGdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> begin 644 H44.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> Attachment decoded: H44.jpg
>>>>> `
>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Model also seen in 45-96, C-405, C-414, C-415, P67, P77, R461,
>>>> R462, R-476, X-16, XXJ-14, XXJ-23.
>>>> There's one photo with the name Ann. Does that connect with a last
>>>> name for anyone? My archives had a claim for the name Dolly Miller
>>>> but I doubt it.
>>>>
>>>> --rwl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>> software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>> begin 644 C-405 match Ann x16246.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Attachment decoded: C-405 match Ann x16246.jpg
>>>> `
>>>> end
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the information. I looked at MyArchives and it seems the
>>> ID is based on this "She was identifed as Dolly Miller in the August
>>> 1952 issue of EYEFUL, page 15, with the added description: "This
>>> blonde honey stands exactly 5' 8 1/2" and tips the scales at a nice
>>> round 132 pounds. Like her?""
>>>
>>> I don't have access to that mag so I can' comment further.
>>>
>>> HM
>>>
>>
>>Thanks for that info, that may lead to discovering the magazine pages
>>sometime soon. That they cited a source says a LOT about the probable
>>reliability of the claim.
>>
>>--rwl
>
> Here's the only reference I could find to Dolly Miller. Looks like
> she was still growing.
The magazine pic looks like it could be C-405 but I wish that either the
mag pic showed that chin mole we see in C-405 or that we had a later pic of
her with the name attached. I'll keep that name as a "probable" ID. And
we still have that one pic with "Ann" written on it.
--rwl
|
|