> jj@aol.com (JJ) wrote in news:sN2dncnN7KDuDE_GnZ2dnUU7-
> SXNnZ2d@earthlink.com:
>
>>
>> =ybegin part=1 line=128 size=5653 name=112.jpg
>> =ypart begin=1 end=5653
>>
>> Attachment decoded: 112.jpg
>> =yend size=5653 part=1 pcrc32=b30c1ee1
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>
>
> Is Virginia Rogers the same girl as in the attached? (I know they are
> poor copies, but it is all that I can lay my hands on right now.) As
> I read the name in one it is Virginia Appasilo, while the other is
> Virginia Appicelo. That is certainly close enough to be just a
> spelling error. It sure looks like the same girl - her boobs are quite
> distinctive.
>
>
> begin 644 Virginia Appicelo stereo slide+maybeVirginiaRogers.jpg
>
> Attachment decoded: Virginia Appicelo stereo
> slide+maybeVirginiaRogers.jpg `
> end
>
>
> begin 644 catalog page6.jpg
>
> Attachment decoded: catalog page6.jpg
> `
> end
>
It seems likely, that ad looks a lot like her.
--rwl
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage/16279', 'Re: Virginia Rogers aka Carolyn Rogers - - - - - - - - - - - -- [001/115] - "112.jpg" yEnc (1/1) - 2 attachments')){kind=link}