On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:14:49 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I can't respond specifically to the various pix i posted re: they are
>> Dagmar aka Virginia Ruth Egnor OR Joan Blondell.
>>
>> The Joan Blondell pix were gathered together from multiple sources and
>> as noted, most if not all denote Joan Blondell as the model.
>>
>> I believe them all to be of Joan Blondell, from looking at them in
>> comparison to Dagmar. Since many of the Blondell pix are from early
>> years in showbiz (1920s and 1930s) and may or may not be Blondell.
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>
>Hi, JJ!
>
>Thanks for these posts. They raise some interesting questions and I admit
>that following today's post I am not as sure about "the Dagmars" as I had
>been shown previously. Clearly, Joan Blondell is not TV's Dagmar/Egnor. But
>it seems we are still up in the air as to:
>- are the claimed Joan Blondell nudes really Joan Blondell, TV's
>Dagmar/Egnor, or someone else?
>- is the Set 2K model TV's Dagmar/Egnor or is someone else?
>- was there maybe more than one Ruth Egnor?
>
>Well, one of the things we do here is try to make sense of the confusion
>from the past! Fun!
>
>--rwl
Thanks for your post.
After posting some additional info on Joan Blondell inc. her movie
history and background, I'm more certain that all of the pix I posted
of Blondell ARE in fact Joan Blondell, especially the early ones from
30s, etc.
I'm less certain that they could be Dagmar aka Ruth Egnor.
-JJ
|
|