Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:14:49 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: retrowavelength - Egnor or Blondell ?
From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
References: <2hm9sdpp5e4j0q99imfv0d4ukk3d69e5r9@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Message-ID: <m_WdnebkCeXEjFjGnZ2dnUU7-evNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:14:49 -0500
Lines: 31
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-ph4Al2az90hDCSi134ZaMZo+hmR/siC+Mb99UZjIZwEgv1V9rohiK7E54fXCBUC8c8cGzanExDYLghE!EF9pS7c07/x/HW2QM/GMZKorpbTNvPodSfdnYVGQ4gIlUhElkl1e2fI4LdtXm7HafRruPZZzScs=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2183
X-Received-Bytes: 2305
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1484814433
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:16191
> I can't respond specifically to the various pix i posted re: they are
> Dagmar aka Virginia Ruth Egnor OR Joan Blondell.
>
> The Joan Blondell pix were gathered together from multiple sources and
> as noted, most if not all denote Joan Blondell as the model.
>
> I believe them all to be of Joan Blondell, from looking at them in
> comparison to Dagmar. Since many of the Blondell pix are from early
> years in showbiz (1920s and 1930s) and may or may not be Blondell.
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
Hi, JJ!
Thanks for these posts. They raise some interesting questions and I admit
that following today's post I am not as sure about "the Dagmars" as I had
been shown previously. Clearly, Joan Blondell is not TV's Dagmar/Egnor. But
it seems we are still up in the air as to:
- are the claimed Joan Blondell nudes really Joan Blondell, TV's
Dagmar/Egnor, or someone else?
- is the Set 2K model TV's Dagmar/Egnor or is someone else?
- was there maybe more than one Ruth Egnor?
Well, one of the things we do here is try to make sense of the confusion
from the past! Fun!
--rwl
|
|