In article <aeednTUEqMJybw_GnZ2dnUU7-ROdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > news:mqGdnVYtCKpkLBDGnZ2dnUU7-RnNnZ2d@giganews.com:
> >
> >>> Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>> news:vtcjod9d7hf0p4reggcocf2t6h67ren3kg@4ax.com:
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:49:20 -0500, retrowavelength
> >>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:36:59 -0500, retrowavelength
> >>>>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> =ybegin line=128 size=459648 name=checklist_A.jpg.bin
> >>>>>>>> Attachment decoded: checklist_A.jpg.bin
> >>>>>>>> =yend size=459648 crc32=5806a32b
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Comments on the checklist_A.jpg
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Faye Syms - I'd like to know what set that was. :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi rwl, I was just looking at some old messages and noticed
> >>>>>> this comment. Don't know if you were serious or if you're
> >>>>>> still interested, but here's the photo her face came from.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Thanks for following up on that. I was generally leery of the
> >>>>>checklists, if I recall rightly, because they were supposedly based
> >>>>>on Myarchives info which is sometimes wrong (to be fair, they
> >>>>>weren't trying to be a research site). But this name I can confirm.
> >>>>
> >>>> Those checklist indexes are sure a mixed bag. Looks like
> >>>> it was a lot of work to put them together, too bad there's
> >>>> no provenance for so many of the names, beyond Myarchives
> >>>> I mean.
> >>>>
> >>>> Faye is one of the lucky ones :)
> >>>>
> >>>> RR
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> rwl
> >>>
> >>> I missed the lists. Can they be posted again? I would be very
> >>> interested in looking them over.
> >>> Thanks very much if possible.
> >>>
> >>
> >> For what it's worth, I went thru the 3 files & checkmarked ones that
> >> I'm sure I have some documentation for the names (other than per
> >> seller or per myarchives or per Spider Pool Research Group even though
> >> I have a good deal of trust in SPRG determinations). There's a number
> >> of the names that I kinda accept (maybe because they get so much
> >> repetition) but I didn't check those. Maybe y'all can add more checks
> >> if you have names in print, etc.
> >>
> >> --rwl
> >>
> >
> >
> > If I find anything I'll let you know.
> >
> > Is there a logic to the order? There seems to be several groups sorted
> > in alphabetic order but I can't figure out what the groups represent.
> > Years? My mind is balking at having to look all through each sheet to
> > find a name. That's a lot of names.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> I didn't see any obvious logic to it though I kinda thought some of it may
> have been pasted in from other shorter lists & that makes parts of it look
> organized but not the whole thing.
>
> --rwl
Your right that the checklists were compiled of 2 or 3 lists that were
in aiphabetical order, now stacked together. Just thought I would give
something back to the group. Whether the name confirmed or not it helps
me sort/file a picture from time to time. I will look over your check
marks and if I can supply any proof of name I will post it.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage/15969', 'Re: my checklist A - "checklist_A.jpg" yEnc + MacBin (1/1)')){kind=link}