Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 17:13:13 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: my checklist A - "checklist_A.jpg" yEnc + MacBin (1/1)
From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
References: <181020171825561586%nobody@none.com> <5M-dnTGy_IymBHPEnZ2dnUU7-UXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <uccdoddhepi5m76095i5idcp915dhoa857@4ax.com> <yfCdncXiotg94hTGnZ2dnUU7-a_NnZ2d@giganews.com> <vtcjod9d7hf0p4reggcocf2t6h67ren3kg@4ax.com> <XnsA9505BF312540roakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Message-ID: <mqGdnVYtCKpkLBDGnZ2dnUU7-RnNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 17:13:13 -0500
Lines: 53
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-mhKMHZXJzPPBsb777Kou2pSgqizbcNCLwpuAJf6z4ZXxloDVLiBEMtyV5RUBSQj5FZIPkDb5Zqwu3bm!EvzghkArutds2aP9w1OQMBRdpgDeEMe/sJGE+9j+ar6pLMyUluTeqeHRLPEQHSS0qgx6lyDmtGvB
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3188
X-Received-Bytes: 3279
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4073113263
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:15937
> Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:vtcjod9d7hf0p4reggcocf2t6h67ren3kg@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:49:20 -0500, retrowavelength
>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:36:59 -0500, retrowavelength
>>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> =ybegin line=128 size=459648 name=checklist_A.jpg.bin
>>>>>> Attachment decoded: checklist_A.jpg.bin
>>>>>> =yend size=459648 crc32=5806a32b
>>>>>
>>>>>Comments on the checklist_A.jpg
>>>>
>>>>>Faye Syms - I'd like to know what set that was. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Hi rwl, I was just looking at some old messages and noticed
>>>> this comment. Don't know if you were serious or if you're
>>>> still interested, but here's the photo her face came from.
>>>
>>>Thanks for following up on that. I was generally leery of the
>>>checklists, if I recall rightly, because they were supposedly based on
>>>Myarchives info which is sometimes wrong (to be fair, they weren't
>>>trying to be a research site). But this name I can confirm.
>>
>> Those checklist indexes are sure a mixed bag. Looks like
>> it was a lot of work to put them together, too bad there's
>> no provenance for so many of the names, beyond Myarchives
>> I mean.
>>
>> Faye is one of the lucky ones :)
>>
>> RR
>>
>
>
> rwl
>
> I missed the lists. Can they be posted again? I would be very
> interested in looking them over.
> Thanks very much if possible.
>
For what it's worth, I went thru the 3 files & checkmarked ones that I'm
sure I have some documentation for the names (other than per seller or per
myarchives or per Spider Pool Research Group even though I have a good deal
of trust in SPRG determinations). There's a number of the names that I
kinda accept (maybe because they get so much repetition) but I didn't check
those. Maybe y'all can add more checks if you have names in print, etc.
--rwl
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage/15937h', 'Re: my checklist A - "checklist_A.jpg" yEnc + MacBin (1/1)')){kind=link}