> Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:vtcjod9d7hf0p4reggcocf2t6h67ren3kg@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:49:20 -0500, retrowavelength
>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:36:59 -0500, retrowavelength
>>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> =ybegin line=128 size=459648 name=checklist_A.jpg.bin
>>>>>> Attachment decoded: checklist_A.jpg.bin
>>>>>> =yend size=459648 crc32=5806a32b
>>>>>
>>>>>Comments on the checklist_A.jpg
>>>>
>>>>>Faye Syms - I'd like to know what set that was. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Hi rwl, I was just looking at some old messages and noticed
>>>> this comment. Don't know if you were serious or if you're
>>>> still interested, but here's the photo her face came from.
>>>
>>>Thanks for following up on that. I was generally leery of the
>>>checklists, if I recall rightly, because they were supposedly based on
>>>Myarchives info which is sometimes wrong (to be fair, they weren't
>>>trying to be a research site). But this name I can confirm.
>>
>> Those checklist indexes are sure a mixed bag. Looks like
>> it was a lot of work to put them together, too bad there's
>> no provenance for so many of the names, beyond Myarchives
>> I mean.
>>
>> Faye is one of the lucky ones :)
>>
>> RR
>>
>
>
> rwl
>
> I missed the lists. Can they be posted again? I would be very
> interested in looking them over.
> Thanks very much if possible.
>
For what it's worth, I went thru the 3 files & checkmarked ones that I'm
sure I have some documentation for the names (other than per seller or per
myarchives or per Spider Pool Research Group even though I have a good deal
of trust in SPRG determinations). There's a number of the names that I
kinda accept (maybe because they get so much repetition) but I didn't check
those. Maybe y'all can add more checks if you have names in print, etc.
--rwl
|
|