Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Vintage Photos - File 123 of 165 - M201b.jpg (1/1) - 2 attachments - 5 attachments (1/2)
Message-ID: <a6f6odlijual5fr2dsp9j0ui3l7rlk0cgt@4ax.com>
References: <FdmdnSOQsawEQeLGnZ2dnUU7-XNQAAAA@giganews.com> <gP2dnYRs1uBeEh3GnZ2dnUU7-YOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <pij3od9ijjbhj2ab7bhk43u78f8p6qhohg@4ax.com> <6aadncd5aLx-bBzGnZ2dnUU7-IWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <35u5odt9qds5g6ks81qbrdfca0qcjne0vb@4ax.com> <lqCdncm8RZDxYh_GnZ2dnUU7-R_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 50
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:50 UTC
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:49 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2607
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2867067813
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:15915
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 14:28:44 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 19:18:43 -0500, retrowavelength
>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:07:47 -0500, retrowavelength
>>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> begin 644 M201b.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attachment decoded: M201b.jpg
>>>>>> `
>>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>>Don't we know the one on the left from some other sets?
>>>>
>>>> I'm beginning to think her name is Cathy Bartlet (based partly
>>>> on the klaw photo S-532), and that she's in CB-132 with Peggy
>>>> Leer.
>>>>
>>>> begin 644 CB132 match (JB0348).jpg
>>>>
>>>> Attachment decoded: CB132 match (JB0348).jpg
>>>> `
>>>> end
>>>>
>>>> begin 644 S532.S512.S575.BAP2 (NEWFO208).jpg
>>>>
>>>> Attachment decoded: S532.S512.S575.BAP2 (NEWFO208).jpg
>>>> `
>>>> end
>>>
>>>Yes, I was just about to post Cathy Bartlett. Good catch!
>>
>> Thanks rwl, great minds, eh? I see now that she's on that
>> checklist index so I guess the name is per myarchives. Oh
>> well, at least 'Cathy' was written on a negative and not
>> just on a print like the last name.
>
>The name is confirmed in Klaw catalogs though I wish I could send you a
>better or bigger copies but I think these are sufficiently convincing.
>begin 644 Cathy Bartlett S-532 nutrix revised bulletin #95.jpg
Thanks very much for all 9 of those! They're a fine size,
and absolutely convincing. Good to know she's legit! Nice
correction for my "S532" as well.
RR
|
|
 - 2 attachments - 5 attachments (1/2)')){kind=link}